[RECOMMENDATION FOR ITCH ASSESSMENT FROM THE ATOPIC ITCH CONSENSUS MEETING (AICOM)].

BACKGROUND: Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research. METHODS: The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants. RESULTS: Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers. CONCLUSION: For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.

The influence of bone marrow edema for the assessment of the boundaries of necrotic lesions in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

This study aimed to investigate the influence of bone marrow edema (BME) for the assessment of the boundaries of necrotic lesions using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance (MR) images in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). We retrospectively reviewed 72 consecutive hips in 55 patients of ONFH that were Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage III or higher and underwent both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR imaging between January 2005 and February 2016. The degree of extension of BMEs, and the boundaries of the necrotic lesions were compared using unenhanced and CE MR images on both mid coronal and mid oblique-axial slices. Forty-two percent of the coronal T1 images, 40% of the coronal fat-saturated T2 images, and 48% of the oblique-axial T1 images showed differences in the boundaries of necrotic lesion, by comparison with those of CET1-weighted MR images. The boundaries of necrotic lesions were clearly detected in all hips on CE coronal slices and 97% of all hips on CE oblique-axial slices. The BME grade in the difference group was significantly higher than in the non-difference group on the coronal plane (P = 0.0058). There were significant differences between the BME grade and duration from the onset of hip pain to MR imaging examination. Multivariate analyses revealed that the duration from the onset to MR imaging examination in both coronal (P = 0.0008) and oblique-axial slices (P = 0.0143) were independently associated with differences in the boundary of necrotic lesion between T1 and CET1-weighted MR images. Our findings suggest that unenhanced MR image may be insufficient for a precise assessment of the boundaries of the necrotic lesions for ONFH cases in the early phase of subchondral collapse due to the diffuse BME.